Does a Movie Really Need to Double its Budget to be Profitable?

The notion that a movie must double its budget to be considered profitable is a common belief that has persisted for years. However, the reality of movie economics is far more complex, with a web of Hollywood accounting practices and streaming disruption making it increasingly difficult to determine true profitability.

The Staggering Costs of Filmmaking

At the most basic level, the costs of making a movie are staggering. Even a relatively modest $30 million budget can quickly balloon when you factor in the salaries of the thousands of people involved – from the A-list actors to the behind-the-scenes crew.

• The cast and crew of a major blockbuster can easily number in the thousands, with roles ranging from directors and screenwriters to cinematographers, editors, visual effects artists, sound engineers, and more. Each of these individuals needs to be compensated.

• The equipment required is also incredibly expensive. High-end movie cameras can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and the sets, props, and other physical production elements add up quickly.

• Production timelines are lengthy, with the average Hollywood movie taking 1-2.5 years to go from filming to final release. All those people need to be paid during this entire process.

• And that’s just the initial production costs. Once a film is in the can, there are massive marketing and distribution expenses to consider. Major blockbusters can have marketing budgets exceeding $200 million – more than the cost of the film itself.

So while a movie may have a $30 million budget on paper, the true “all-in” cost to get it made and released can easily double or triple that figure. This is where the “double the budget” rule of thumb originates – the idea that a movie needs to make at least twice its total costs to be considered profitable.

More: Your Selfie From Space: How to Build and Launch Your Own Satellite

The Smoke and Mirrors of Hollywood Accounting

However, the reality is that this rule is more myth than fact, thanks to the creative accounting practices of Hollywood studios. Known as “Hollywood accounting,” these opaque financial maneuvers allow studios to make even the most successful films appear unprofitable on paper.

The case of the Queen biopic Bohemian Rhapsody is a prime example. Despite grossing nearly $900 million at the global box office, the screenwriter was told the film had actually lost $51 million. How is that possible?

• The studio claimed there were over $900 million in additional, unspecified expenses that wiped out the film’s profits. But without access to the studio’s books, there’s no way to verify where all that money supposedly went.

• This is a common tactic – studios can simply shift revenue and expenses around between their various divisions to make a film appear unprofitable, even when it’s a massive hit.

• Another example is the Harry Potter franchise. Despite the films grossing nearly $1 billion each, Warner Bros. claimed the fifth installment, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, lost $167 million. This was achieved through questionable charges like $212 million in “distribution fees” paid to another Warner Bros. division.

• Actors, writers, and other creatives who are promised a percentage of a film’s profits are often left empty-handed, as studios insist the movie never actually turned a profit.

So the “double the budget” rule is essentially meaningless, as studios have mastered the art of making even their most successful films appear unprofitable on paper. The true profitability of a movie is often obscured by these creative accounting practices.

The Rise of Streaming Complicates the Picture Further

Adding to the complexity is the rise of streaming, which has dramatically disrupted the traditional movie business model. Streaming services like Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Prime don’t operate by the same box office metrics as traditional studios.

• For streaming services, “profitability” is often measured by subscriber growth and retention, rather than box office returns. A film that performs poorly in theaters may still be considered a success if it drives new subscribers to the platform.

• Streaming services also don’t typically share viewership data or financial details, making it nearly impossible for outsiders to determine the true performance and profitability of individual titles.

• Films that were originally intended for theatrical release are increasingly being sold to streaming services, depriving filmmakers of the potential backend profits they may have earned from box office performance.

• The shift to streaming has also impacted the lucrative physical media market, which used to provide a significant revenue stream for studios. With fewer people buying DVDs and Blu-rays, that income has dried up.

So the rise of streaming has further muddied the waters when it comes to determining a film’s profitability. The old rules of thumb no longer apply, as streaming services prioritize subscriber growth over box office returns.

Navigating the New Movie Economics

Given the complexities of Hollywood accounting and the disruption of streaming, is there any way to reliably determine whether a movie is truly profitable? Here are a few key considerations:

• Focus on gross revenue, not net profits. As we’ve seen, studios can manipulate net profits through creative accounting. Gross box office and streaming viewership numbers provide a more transparent picture of a film’s performance.

• Look for films that recoup their production budget. While the “double the budget” rule is flawed, a film that at least earns back its initial production costs is a better indicator of profitability.

• Consider the long-term value of intellectual property. Even if a film doesn’t immediately turn a profit, it may have value as part of a larger franchise or cinematic universe. The merchandising, sequels, and spin-offs can make up for an underwhelming initial box office.

• Pay attention to backend deals. Actors, writers, and other creatives who negotiate a percentage of a film’s gross revenue, rather than net profits, are more likely to be compensated fairly.

• Recognize the impact of streaming. While streaming makes it harder to determine profitability, films that drive significant subscriber growth or retention for a platform may still be considered successful, even if they don’t meet traditional box office thresholds.

Ultimately, the economics of the movie industry have become increasingly complex, with the “double the budget” rule no longer a reliable metric. Studios have mastered the art of creative accounting, while the rise of streaming has further muddied the waters.

But by focusing on gross revenue, considering long-term franchise value, and understanding the nuances of backend deals and streaming metrics, it’s possible to get a clearer picture of a film’s true profitability. The movie business may be more opaque than ever, but there are still ways to navigate the new realities of Hollywood economics.